chore(evals): Update model evaluations 2026-06-16#138
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe Changesgpt-5-mini Evaluation Results Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
❌ 2 Tests Failed:
View the full list of 2 ❄️ flaky test(s)
To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/model-evaluation.md (1)
36-36:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorClarify the actual task passing criterion — documentation at line 36 contradicts results table.
Line 36 states tasks pass when "all its assertions pass and the LLM judge approves." However, the results table shows
rhsa-not-supportedandcve-nonexistentmarked as Pass despite failing themaxCallsassertion. Either the passing criterion at line 36 is incomplete, or the Result column should reflect the documented requirement of all assertions passing.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/model-evaluation.md` at line 36, Update the task passing criterion statement at line 36 to accurately reflect the actual passing logic. The current statement says all assertions must pass AND the LLM judge approves, but the results table shows tasks like rhsa-not-supported and cve-nonexistent marked as Pass despite failing the maxCalls assertion. Either clarify line 36 to document the actual, more lenient passing criteria (if failing some assertions is acceptable), or update the language to precisely explain which assertions are required to pass versus which are optional for task completion.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/model-evaluation.md`:
- Line 36: Update the task passing criterion statement at line 36 to accurately
reflect the actual passing logic. The current statement says all assertions must
pass AND the LLM judge approves, but the results table shows tasks like
rhsa-not-supported and cve-nonexistent marked as Pass despite failing the
maxCalls assertion. Either clarify line 36 to document the actual, more lenient
passing criteria (if failing some assertions is acceptable), or update the
language to precisely explain which assertions are required to pass versus which
are optional for task completion.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 13f07577-395c-4ef6-b99d-c085a2e2ec96
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/model-evaluation.md
E2E Test ResultsCommit: 3712f51 |
3 participants
Automated weekly model evaluation update.
Models evaluated: gpt-5-mini
Date: 2026-06-16
This PR was automatically generated by the Model Evaluation workflow.